Foster identifies six historical streams of Christianity, lived out fully by Jesus and partially by the rest of us. For each of these streams he gives a biography of a historical figure, a biblical character, and a modern person from the twentieth century. Then he identifies the defining characteristics of stream, and identifies strengths and potential pitfalls. This summary is hardly adequate, though, so if this sounds interesting, I commend a purusal of the notes section to you.
The Contemplative stream, and is demonstrated by St. Anthony, the apostle John, and Frank C. Laubach (missionary and literacy program developer). This stream focuses on intimacy with God through prayer, which results of love, joy, and delight, but also in purging fire.
The Holiness stream, demonstrated by Phoebe Palmer (Methodist), James the Just (Jesus’ brother), and Dietrich Bonhoeffer, focuses on the virtuous life. “Virtue” here is more of the sense “a life that works”, the opposite of “vice”, which is something that makes life not “work”. It focuses on the heart, and purity with God.
The Charismatic stream is the spirit-empowered life, demonstrated by St. Francis, the apostle Paul, and William Seymour (leader of the Azuza Street revival that founded Pentecostalism). The focus here is on Holy Spirit power through the gifts of the spirit, whose purpose is to deepen our love with Christ.
The Social Justice stream is demonstrated by John Woolman (first American colonist to campaign against slavery), the prophet Amos, and Dorthy Day. This stream focuses on bringing righteous-justice, lovingkindess, and peaceful-unity to all relationships: personal, social, and institutional. (Note that this stream has nothing to do with the contemporaneous “Social Justice” movement with its roots in a Marxist oppressor-oppressed power binary, which is not a stream of Christianity at all.)
The Evangelical stream is demonstrated by St. Augustine, the apostle Peter, and Billy Graham. It focuses not only on proclaiming the gospel, but also on the Bible as the external arbiter of what is true, and on the community of faith living out the consequences of the Christ event.
The Incarnational stream highlights Susanna Wesley, Bezalel (chief craftsman of the Taberncale), and Dag Hammarskjöld (influential U.N. Secretary-General). Also referred to as sacramental living, this stream focuses on living out Christ in every moment, because the physical world is how God expresses himself to us (and how we express him).
Foster has distilled the different streams, which we usually encounter mixed together when streams spill over into ours (or occasionally, we spill into theirs), into a coherent summary. His summaries do a great job of incorporating the full richness of the tradition, rather than the truncated forms we tend to see them in. Thus, Social Justice isn’t just about prioritizing the poor, but rather shalom in human relationships, which is much deeper than simply something like giving handouts to homeless. Similarly, the list of strengths and pitfalls are pretty accurate. In the streams that I have experienced (and become somewhat disillusioned with at the moment), he articulates in one or two paragraphs the dysfunctions that have taken me one or two years to become aware of and attempt to describe in five minute, wandering diatribes. Furthermore, he gives the causes of the dysfunctions. Which makes me wonder how he managed to do this, since coming at this through personal experience would seem like it would take a lifetime—the streams take years to internalize, let alone distill down to their essence.
Foster seems to be most sympathetic to the social justice stream, and least sympathetic to the charismatic stream. In fact, the charismatic chapter is only about 60% of the length of the other chapters. A more complete discussion might include the Charismatic Renewal in the Anglican and Catholic churches, and the Vineyard movement, which taught lay people to use the more “supernatural” spiritual gifts in the course of normal ministry. A discussion of miracles—healing being the most common—would be helpful, too, since miracles are a prominent feature of Charismatics and can be a divisive topic that is misunderstood by non-Charismatics and even unhealthily prioritized by Charismatics.
I found this book quite helpful. Not only did it introduce me to other streams of which I was only vaguely aware of (due to spillover into mine from adjacent streams), but it helped me appreciate their richness and how essential each is to living in the Kingdom. It is helpful to be able to identify the streams that resonate most strongly right now to get an idea of where to pursue them. It is also helpful to understand the importance and strengths in the other streams so that we can appreciate them rather than writing them off. Also, Foster’s descriptions of the streams I have been steeped in were challenging, because his distallations reminded me that everything is pointing back to Christ, but frequently I had not internalized that, or had lost focus on that essential purpose.
Ch. 1: Imatio: The Divine Paradigm
- The different streams are paradigms for imitating Christ and living like Jesus
- The Contemplative Stream
- This is intimacy with God through prayer.
- Jesus frequently and habitually went to lonely places to pray. His intimacy with God was such that he only did what he say the Father doing, and how he spoke not on his own but the words of the Father.
- The Holiness Stream
- This is the virtuous life, relating to all people effectively and at the right time, in the right way.
- The core for this can be seen in his temptation in the desert, where he rejected using human institutions to accomplish his goals.
- He rejected the economic temptation, to miraculously feed the masses.
- He rejected the religious temptation of a supernatural spectacle in the Temple that would have assured support from the religious leaders, at the cost of not being able to speak out about their failings.
- He rejected the political temptation to use political power (both coercive force as well as popular acclaim) to achieve his ends, especially at the cost of this soul.
- Love requires action, and Jesus both taught and embodied the Law of Love. For instance, the Sermon on the Mount is such a teaching.
- The Charismatic Stream
- This is the Spirit-empowered life
- Jesus exercised a number of spiritual gifts, most notably wisdom, discerning of spirits (for instance, knowing that the Pharisees were questioning in their hearts his statement about forgiving sins), miracles, exorcism, and healing.
- He promised living waters, and joy in the Spirit.
- The Social Justice Stream
- This is releasing the captives, bringing sight to the blind, and letting the oppressed go free, as Jesus proclaimed at the beginning of his ministry. It is implementing a permanent Year of Jubilee.
- Jesus makes a point of including the unblessed.
- Instead of building his kingdom through military might, he built it through love and divine community, which includes everyone and meets the needs of everyone.
- The Evangelical Stream
- The Word-centered life, both proclaiming the good news of the Kingdom and living it out.
- Previously the Kingdom of Love was only available through Israel, but Jesus opened its doors to everyone who would believe and follow him (that is, conform their lives to his).
- We are to make disciples of all nations (not converts), teaching them to be followers of Christ.
- The Incarnational Stream
- This is living as Christ in the present moment.
- Jesus did not begin ministry until about 30, so it was in those 30 years of normal living as a child, as a carpenter where he learned to have the spiritual disciplines and to live out love that would enable his ministry.
- Jesus’ work is not limited to stained glass windows and the Cross; Jesus’ work was the everyday moments of his life.
Ch. 2: The Contemplative Tradition: Discovering the Prayer-Filled Life
- St. Anthony:
- Raised as a Christian and orphaned as a teenager, he felt called to give his money away, so he provided for his sister and sold the rest of his inheritance. Then he went into the desert to find God and fight the devil.
- He found God in the desert, and he also fought the devil (including the “demons” within the self). This resulted in him growing in character and understanding the heart (by means of understanding his own heart).
- After 20 years of this, he had a very effective ministry among both the elite and the rejects, where he taught, counseled, healed, discerned spirits (which was a component of his ministering effectively to people), cast out demons, preached the gospel with power, confronted unjust judges, and brought reconciliation between groups. Everyone who came to him left encouraged and changed.
- The Apostle John
- John was Jesus’ closest friend, one of the three who Jesus invited into his most glorious and intimate moments, and repeatedly (self-)described as “the disciple whom Jesus loved”. This love must have transformed him, because his writings emphasize Jesus’ love.
- He is clear that the divine love is initiating (“we love because he first loved us”) and also requires visible expression (if you say you love God but do not provide for a brother in need, you are a liar).
- Frank C. Laubach
- Highly educated in the US, and helped start a seminary in the Philippines in the early 1900s. Lost the vote to become its president by one vote, because he courteously voted for his opponent; was very disappointed. Eventually stopped blaming himself and in 1929 accepted a call to evangelism in a remote area.
- It was too remote and risky of illness, so his wife and remaining child stayed 900 miles away, so he was lonely. Also the work was not effective. Every evening he and his dog climbed Signal Hill behind where he lived. One evening in Dec 1929, his lips moved with God’s words, and God said that he had no success because he thought he was white and superior, but if he would think only how God loved them he would succeed. He also said that if he wanted them to be fair to his religion, he needed to be fair to theirs. So he asked to study the Koran. Two years later he said that something must have happened on Signal Hill, because he did nothing besides pray for the people and walk among them thinking of God, yet the Muslim clerics told everyone in the province that he would help people know God.
- One day walking up Signal Hill, his lips moved with beautiful poetry, the memory of which he treasured.
- He did lots of experiments in prayer, including trying to see if he could have God in mind each minute he was awake. Similarly, he tried to see if he could live in such a way that he gave people Christ when they experienced him.
- He learned that he experienced God best when he worked while listening, more than meditatively or in prayer. One time God told him that when he prayed for his needs his prayers were thin and weak, but when he prayed to be a channel to help others they were “large and noble”. He found that he got energized by praying for others, especially when he was there among them.
- He learned the language of the people on the island, which was very regular, and he taught people how to read, then taught people to teach others. This was so successful that when his funding ran out because of the Great Depression, one of the major chiefs required each person to teach another person. Other people eventually heard about his program, and he was invited to do literacy trainings in many places, and was even part of the US literacy program. Forty Years with the Silent Billion is his most famous book on literacy.
- The contemplative life is: beautiful of soul, purging fire and enveloping love.
- The most characteristic elements are: love, peace, delight, emptiness (both a longing for more as well as times of darkness), fire (passion and distaste for anything that gets in the way of communion with God), wisdom (knowing as we are known), transformation.
- Strengths
- The emphasis on maintaining our first love, and that the Christian life happens by love not effort.
- Disrupts a cerebral and arms-length faith.
- Prayer is the essential thing, and something that can be done without ceasing.
- We are responsible for doing this ourselves; no one else can do it for us.
- Weaknesses:
- Separating it from everyday life, instead of incorporating it into everyday life.
- Excessive asceticism. Asceticism means exercise/training, and there is a temptation to over-exercise, similar to the gym rat who lives for the gym.
- Not valuing intellectual expressions of faith.
- Neglecting community.
Ch. 3: The Holiness Tradition: Discovering the Virtuous Life
- Phoebe Palmer (1807 - 1874):
- Father was a convert of John Wesley, she grew up Scotch Methodist. Her third child died in infancy as a result of a flash fire when the maid dropped a lamp on the gauze covering of the crib. She “‘grasped my darling from the flames. She darted one inexpressible look of amazement and pity, on her agonized mother, and then closed her eyes forever on the scenes of earth.’” (62) In agony and grief, she heard God whisper to her mind that her Father loves her and would not permit such a trial without intending that a commensurate good would result. She asked what to do, and the answer was to “be still and know that I am God”. He assured her that she would know hereafter what she did not know now. So she resolved to devote the time that would have been spent caring for her child to Jesus, so that the death of her child would result in spiritual life for many.
- The Methodist saints all were very aware of their sinfulness, but she struggled because she could never get such an “epiphany of wretchedness” (64), and her efforts only drew her deeper into God’s love. Through the diverse stories of others she saw that there was more to God’s sanctifying grace than just knowing one’s wretched sinfulness. One day she laid everything on God’s altar—body, soul, time, talents, husband, children, etc. and was assured that God accepted her sacrifice. She was cleansed of idolatry, and “‘ I knew that I dwelt in God, and felt that he had become the portion of my soul, my ALL IN ALL.’” (64) This theme of the altar became an important part of her ministry—to one church that refused to build alter she said that if they wanted a move of God, it was completely necessary; they relented, and many people crowded around the altar at the service.
- She believed that since the Holy Spirit at Pentecost had come on both men and women to give them power in testifying to Christ that women were not only allowed to speak, but were required to do so by the Holy Spirit. She went so far as to say that the slow suffocation of women had more profoundly martyred women than the fires martyred the actual martyrs. The idea that women were expected to speak of Christ had a large influence on the Pentecostal movement.
- For many years she lead Tuesday Meeting for Holiness at her house, which was originally only for women but was so popular that many male leaders visited, and it became a template for many other meetings. Her house had to be renovated four times to fit the eventually 400 people. She founded the Methodist Church’s mission to China, was directly related to a number of Protestant denominations, and influenced founders/leaders of a number of universities as well as Christian groups such as the Salvation Army, Keswick Movement, and Assemblies of God.
- James the Just, younger brother of Jesus:
- Originally a disbeliever, Jesus seems to have appeared to him after his resurrection (“he appeared to James and then all the apostles”), with the result that he was there at Pentecost. He was the leader of the church at Jerusalem, and was thought well of by all people, so much so that when the high priest had him killed in AD 62, Josephus records that quite a few people thought it was not right. He prayed so much at the Temple that he knees developed callouses like a camel’s.
- Jame’s epistle is not about action, but rather about the centrality of the heart: if our “central core” (71) is earthly and unspiritual, then disorder and wickedness result, but if our central core is pure, peaceable, etc., then the result is a “harvest of righteousness”. Thus purifying the heart is core to the epistle. By looking at our actions, we can see the heart, hence why undefined religion is caring for the orphans and widows and keeping ourselves unstained by the world: caring for the helpless is the sort of thing a pure heart will do.
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer:
- Bonhoeffer tried to keep the German church from embracing the Nazi state, and resolutely opposed the Nazis on the grounds that it was completely opposed to the character of Christ. He was imprisoned and executed shortly before WWII ended.
- Six reasons why the author considers him a model for the virtuous life (the first three are about Christ being the center of all things):
- He took Jesus seriously: If he died and was resurrected, we must recognize him in the world today and follow him in all things. This involves not just the (obviously) wise things, but also the areas where Jesus stands opposed to the current culture and the places where the culture mocks his stance.
- He took the call to discipleship seriously: He took the Sermon on the Mount as something essential to obey. The Cost of Discipleship describes his thought on what obedience looked like. “‘Cheap grace is the preaching of forgiveness without requiring repentance, baptism without church discipline, Communion without confession, absolution without personal confession.’” (76)
- He took spiritual discipline seriously: He kept a “new monasticsm” based on the Sermon on the Mount. His goal in spiritual discipline was to be “‘assimilated to the form of Christ in its entirety, the form of Christ incarnate, crucified, and glorified.’” (77) He had daily habits of prayer, meditation, and sacrament which built the spiritual resources for his actions.
- Life Together: summary of guiding principles behind the community he had established at Finkenwalde seminary to live out the life of holiness in a “new monastic” community.
- He rejected legalism and insisted on free, responsible, obedient action: he said that it is impossible to satisfy the desire for a rule which will tell is if we are right or wrong. Instead, we must embrace a dialog between God and ourselves, God’s will and our will, for the appropriate response for the now. He rejected any ethics based on finding easy way out, and instead looked at it from the point of view of the oppressed (particularly the Jews in Nazi Germany; for example, expelling the Jews must necessarily bring with it expelling Christ).
- He took the purity of the Church seriously: he insisted that the Church must worship only God, warned against idolatry (particularly against the cult of the Führer) and said the Church has an unconditional obligation to victims regardless of whether they are Christians. He called the German church to confession (which was watered down so much he refused to sign the resulting document). He said that we have an obligation to victims in a society, and in the case of certain types of oppression by the State, we might even have a duty to put a spike in the wheel of State.
- He took the world seriously: He advocated for a “religionless” Christianity, because Christianity is ultimately existing for others, and this can only happen when the entire world is the arena for action, serving all people.
- What is holiness?
- Holiness is ultimately a life that works. Virtue is habits that make life work; vice is habits that bring dysfunction.
- Holiness is attention on the heart, and being disciplined about transforming our center.
- Holiness is being in the world but not of the world, and is incarnational.
- Holiness sees the body as good, and applies spiritual disciplines to create a workable harmony with the spirit.
- Holiness is not works (something that we brings us merit) but rather something God does in us through grace, but equally, it is something that we must actively participate in. "Effort is not the opposite of grace; works is.” (84)
- Holiness is progressing in purity and unity with God.
- Strengths
- “The ultimate goal of the Christian life: an ever deeper formation of the inner personality so as to reflect the glory and goodness of God” (85)
- The heart is the well-spring of action; the action itself is not virtuous.
- We can and should see progress in our lives.
- We grow in grace. Some parts of this growth are sovereign acts of God, but most of it is the slow growth through character transformation. The dawn displaces the darkness slowly. “[Character transformation] always proceeds at a rate consistent with the nature of the virtue being sought.” (90)
- Weaknesses
- Legalism: when we turn our attention from the heart to the externals, this results in legalism of some sort. It is tempting to find a rubric to know who is “holy” and who is not, but it is “a virtue to ignore this question”. (92)
- Pelagianism: any way of earning our own merit with God. But sometimes we are so wary of this that we fall into the opposite problem and say that progress on our own is impossible because it is all unmerited grace.
- Perfectionism: generally results from failing the first two: if I have an external standard that I have succeeded in accomplishing, then it is tempting to see oneself as perfect. This results in living a lie, as well as being judgmental. We should strive to be perfect, since the goal is to be more like Christ and because “God meets us at the point of our effort”, but we also need to be clear-eyed about where we actually are.
- Practicing holiness:
- We train through spiritual disciplines that “stimulate our growth in grace. If we are struggling with pride, we learn service... If we are needing hope, we learn prayer and meditation... If compulsions of one kind or another obsess us, we learn fasting” (95)
- Invite others to travel with us. These become companions, mentors and people we pour into.
- When we fail, get up and keep going.
Ch. 4: The Charismatic Tradition: Discovering the Spirit-Empowered Life
- St. Francis of Assisi
- Walked in power: was persuaded to host a meal with Clare, which he did in a country church, and spoke so fervently of Christ that all in attendance were moved. The villagers saw the forest and church on fire, but when they arrived, there was no fire, it was Holy Spirit fire. In the incident with Brother Wolf, the wolf visibly agreed to the bargain whereby he did not harm the villagers and in return they would feed him, and kept his side until his death two years later. Apparently dogs did not even bark at him. He healed a person of a tumor through prayer. He had the gift of discernment.
- The essence of the Charismatic Stream is using the gifts to bring people more in love with God. This was the consistent motive and result of Francis’ actions. People were brought in love with God as a result of hearing him. He put on the first Christmas creche (with real baby and his followers singing), with the result that the villagers got a firsthand experience of who Jesus was and went home rejoicing. One of the villagers had a vision there, of a dead baby brought to life by Francis’ touch: symbolic of Francis reviving the love of Christ in their hearts.
- Francis and his followers lived in joy. He called himself “God’s Jongleur”, after the jugglers who accompanied French troubadors. When talking to the Pope about Christ, he could barely restrain himself and moved his feet like dancing.
- The Apostle Paul
- Paul’s ministry was full of the power of the Spirit. Paul was given his gospel by Jesus himself, not from any man. When non-Jews started getting converted in Antioch, Barnabas (who it was noted was full of the Spirit) was sent to investigate, and he saw Paul as the ideal person to help. Some years later, the Spirit sets apart Paul and Barnabas for missionary work. Paul cooperated with the Spirit so closely that when he told the sorceror Elymas that he would be blinded, God did it. His ministry in Macedonia started because of a vision he saw. He cast out a demon from a little girl, which got him thrown in jail because the owners could no longer make money with her, but the result was that the jailer got converted. Back in Asia, people were healed just by being touched with cloths that had touched Paul.
- William Seymour
- Seymour, a self-educated black man, had as one of his driving desires a desire to bring racial reconciliation through the power of the Spirit. He felt a call to ministry in in Cincinnati while attending the “Evening Light Saints”. His evangelistic work caused him to travel a lot, and he moved to Houston since he found relatives there. While there he served as an interim pastor for Lucy Farrow, who was in Kansas serving as a governess for Charles Parham’s children. While there she spoke in tongues, and told Seymour about it when she returned. Parham came to Houston to set up a Bible school, and Seymour listened outside the intentionally left-open door (since blacks and whites could not mix). After a few weeks, a group in California asked him to lead a holiness movement there, as one of their members had been visiting Houston and was impressed with Seymour’s character.
- After a few months, one of the members had a breakthrough and spoke in tongues. That evening at the evening service Seymour started preaching on the Pentecost gathering, but never finished because the man started speaking in tongues and everyone else started, too. Jennie Evans Moore (who married Seymour) played the piano—having never done so before—and sang in six languages she didn’t know, with interpretations for each. Three days later (on Maundy Thursday), Seymour persevered in prayer, saw a bright light, and spoke in tongues. Soon afterwards large numbers of people started attending, so they started meeting at an old building on Azuza St. People from all races and walks of life attended, with 800 inside and 400 outside. People also started going to and being missionaries all over the world. For three years there were services three times a day (frequently merging into one another), with an integrated Christian community: not only blacks and whites, but women also had a large role in leadership, and women would go out with a Bible and anointing oil looking for people to pray for.
- Seymour was one of the last connected ministers seeking the gift of speaking in tongues, but became the most influential. Foster suggests four reasons (in addition to the influence of the Holy Spirt, of course):
- Seymour saw Pentecost as a new Jubilee, whose purpose was to free the oppressed. The day of Pentecost brought about reconciliation between cultures, thus, racial reconciliation was central. But, likewise, there was no slave or free, Jew or Gentile, male or female, and so that was a priority for him.
- As a result, he accepted anyone as a potential person for leadership. Race, gender, education, wealth, or education were not qualifiers or disqualifies, but rather the anointing of the Spirit on the person.
- He emphasized love: “‘The Pentecostal power, when you sum it all up, is just more of God’s love. If it does not bring more of God’s love it is simply a counterfeit.’” (120) He held divine love as “the standard”. White Pentecostal leaders made the standard about speaking in tongues, but Seymour said it didn’t matter how much you spoke in tongues, if you got angry, spoke evilly, or backbit, you did not have the baptism of the Spirit. “‘Pentecost makes us love Jesus more and love our brothers more. It brings us all into one common family.’” (120)
- Seymour was a holy man; he live out what he preached. On one occasion some leaders contended with him on a doctrinal issue, and he said nothing to their accusations, just kept his smile, and eventually they realized they had condemned themselves. He also had great discernment which allowed him to bring the group back to the holy. As a result, no one dared speak except under the Spirit’s anointing.
- The beginning of the end was when Seymour invited Parham. However, it became clear that Parham’s racism was deep-seated, and the congregation did not accept him. So he took 300 people and started a church nearby, and frequently condemned the Azuza St Mission. Eventually some of the other white leadership left, too.
- What is the Charmistic tradition?
- The charismata, the gifts of the Spirit. There are three areas they function in: “leadership, ecstatic empowerment, and community-building” (126) The gifts need to be used in all three, not limited to just one.
- God frequently uses the ecstatic gifts to show that he is somewhere that we assume he isn’t. Hence, tongues of fire on a band of followers of a crucified outlaw-messiah, and tongues of fire on the Gentiles at Cornelius’ house (since everyone knew God wasn’t working in the Gentiles).
- 1 Cor 13 shows how the gifts are to be used:
- Take responsibility: all parts of the body are necessary, even if you do not feel like yours is significant.
- Accept limitation: the body cannot be all the same part, and we do not have everything necessary within ourselves.
- Value others: the flashier parts of the body cannot say they don’t need the others.
- Unity within diversity: the different parts of the body function as a whole
- Strengths
- Prevents us from domesticating God, and offers us the opportunity to stop institutionalizing God and instead surrender to dance with the Spirit.
- Reminds us not to settle for comfortable religious talk; “the kingdom of God depends not on talk but on power”.
- Challenges us to grow.
- “[I]t offers a life of gifting and empowering for witness and service.” (129)
- Weakness
- It’s easy to focus on the signs and wonders. This can be seeking the gifts rather than the giver, as well as superstition and “Christian” magic. We need to remember that the gifts are “for the greater good of the Christian fellowship and for our ongoing formation in the way of Christ.” (130)
- It’s easy to become anti-intellectual. The charismatic emphasis is on the emotive side, but it needs to be a both/and with the rational side.
- Uncoupling the gifts of the Spirit from the fruit of the Spirit
- “[L]inking our walk in the Spirit to highly speculative end-time scenarios that lack theological foundations.” (131)
- Don’t fear that your practicing the gifts will be done in the flesh. There absolutely will be some of that! But God can still use us, and we can learn to walk less in the flesh and more in the Spirit.
Ch. 5: The Social Justice Tradition: Discovering the Compassionate Life
- John Woolman
- By age seven he “‘was acquainted with the operations of Divine love’” (137). He apprenticed as a tailor and became qualified to draft legal documents. He took over his master’s store, and expanded some, but then decided to pare it back to allow more time for itinerant ministry, which he seems to have done in combination with business. Early on he felt strongly that slavery was incompatible with Christian values, and spoke strongly against it, yet did not condemn any individual; instead, he simply firmly acted his conscience. He frequently paid slaves that served him for their service (which angered the owners). He wrote a will for a man who owned a slave, and wrote everything except that slave transfer part, said that he could not in good conscience write that part, but there was no charge for the rest. After a “good conversation”, the slave owner agreed to free his slave and he completed the will. Similarly, after preaching strongly against slavery at a Quaker meeting, he was taken to someone’s home where slaves served. He asked if they were slaves or servants, and when told that they were slaves, he quietly got up and left. The owner freed his slaves the next day (despite his wife’s objections).
- At the Philadelphia Yearly Meeting (the governing body of the local Friends) each year he gave sermons on how slavery was incompatible with God’s values. At the 1758 Yearly Meeting, he sat silently in tears while people tried to come to a compromise (ban only future slaves, etc.). At the end he stood up, once again said that it was not right, and warned that God was sure to punish it. The Meeting voted unanimously to remove slavery from themselves. Friends in other states followed, although in the South it was harder, since to free a slave you had to post a $1000 bail and escort the slave out of the state. So in North Carolina, the Yearly Meeting became a slave holder: freed slaves were donated (since they were property) to the Yearly Meeting, which let them live however they wished.
- When Friends freed their slaves, they paid them the wages they should have earned, which no one else did. Britain compensated slave owners in the West Indies when the slaves were freed, and Lincoln proposed the same for southern owners.
- Woolman’s Journal tells all of this, and is highly regarded as a text.
- Amos
- A native of Judah, God called him to be a prophet in the sophisticated cities of Israel. His messages paint a scathing picture: father’s abusing their authority to sleep with their daughters-in-law, merchants cheating the poor selling adulterated grain with light weights, money-lenders taking the cloak of the poor as a pledge, judges taking bribes to condemn the innocent, judges levying large fines and using the payment to party. As a result, God rejects the festivals in his honor, the sacrifices to him, and the songs in his praise. Religious activities have no value if you live unjustly.
- Amos was not a prophet excited about the doom of his rival nation to the north. He implored the people to change. When the Lord revealed the disaster he was about to inflict on Israel, Amos is full of compassion on Israel and talks him out of it. The third time, though, God switched from the fact of judgment to the reason for it: Amos saw a plumb line and “Israel failed to measure up; her life was too crooked to warrant either pardon or relief. This time Amos was the one who had to relent. Judgement had to come. But it was only the overwhelming, divinely given conviction that justice cannot be separated from liturgical life that allowed Amos to carry out the judgment pronouncements that he did.” (153-4) Even so, he offers words of hope that God will restore Israel.
- Dorthy Day
- Spent much of her childhood in Chicago, and was tender towards God. She would take walks in the park and see him everywhere. At 16 she enrolled at UIUC and studied journalism. She moved to NYC and got involved in the socialist newspapers because of her desire for justice for the poor. She had an affair; she got pregnant and then a painful abortion, which resulted in her being anti-abortion ever afterwards. Shortly afterwards she married a writer, but they divorced after a year. But she also loved The Imitation of Christ, Pensées, Dostoyevsky, and Tolstoy. She became friends with Eugene O'Neill, who introduced her to the poem “The Hound of Heaven”, the idea of which fascinated her.
- She sold the movie rights to her first novel, bought a house on Staten Island by the beach and settled down to write. She met Forster Batterham and they fell in love. He was an atheist, an anarchist, and opposed to man’s institutions (hence marriage was not an option so they had a common law marriage), but loved nature and took her away from her causes and books. This awoke a love of nature, which made her yearn for the eternal. She became pregnant, and was “enraputred with the awareness of how utterly good God is and how filled with everlasting love.” (159) But all this was driving her apart from Batterham. Still, though she loved him and family life, she was determined to become Catholic and baptize her baby. It was a hard decision for both of them, but Day and her daughter were baptized and Batterham left.
- Pope Pius XI said that “‘The workers of the world are lost to the Church.’” (160) Day decided to prove him wrong. At the end of 1932 (during the Great Depression) she witnessed a hunger strike by people desperate for work and food. She went to the crypt of the cathedral (the upper part was still being built) and asked that God would use her talents for her fellow workers, the poor. When she got back to her apartment, a man named Peter Maurin was there, and he said that two communists told him to look her up since they thought alike. He wanted to incarnate the values of Jesus into how he lived. They started the Catholic Worker Movement together. This meant “embracing voluntary poverty through living with the poor and suffering with the poor; it meant engaging in a radical pacifism as a witness to loving all people, especially enemies; it meant doing the ‘corporeal works of mercy’ by feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, and housing the homeless; it meant doing the ‘spiritual works of mercy’ by consoling the afflicted, bearing wrongs patiently” (161) It also meant things like picket lines. They started a newspaper as well as communal farms where this things could be lived out, people could become educated, have discussions, etc. Peter wanted to create “‘a society where it is easier for men to be good.’” (161)
- Day hoped that the farms would be family life organized by the Mass in a sort of monastic life. They were not very successful, due to individualism and our self-centeredness. The most successful was because it was where The Catholic Worker held its Ignatian-style retreats.
- The Catholic Worker newspaper was fairly successful, and was staunchly pacifist. This angered the clergy during Franco’s Spain, since he positioned himself as the protector of the Church, but The Catholic Worker spoke out about the dangers of anti-semitism. Similarly, after Pearl Harbor it took a pacifist stance, which resulted in a lot of canceled subscriptions.
- Her funeral was attended by many, including Batterham, whom she had continued to refer to as “my husband”.
- The Social-Justice Tradition
- “‘The road to holiness necessarily passes through the world of action.’” (166, Dag Hammarskjöld) In this case, the supernatural power is to live incarnationally.
- It is loving the Lord your God with all your heart, and also loving your neighbor as yourself (which is driven by your love for God).
- Three themes:
- mishpat: “justice” but with social, ethical, and religious connotations, and is somewhat synonymous with “righteousness”. This is what political leaders should evidence, and is the purpose behind God’s law of gleaning and Jubilee.
- hesed: “loving-kindness”, frequently used of God’s relationship with us. This is evidenced in the compassion of not taking your neighbor’s cloak in pledge (or returning it to him in the evening) because he needs it to keep warm, and provision for the poor via gleaning.
- shalom: “harmonious unity”, which should be evidenced in our community
- Three arenas:
- Personal: we have to live out what we preach
- Social: we need to live shalom with our family, friends, and neighbors. It also includes things like feeding the hungry, as well as identifying destructive structures the exclude, neglect, manipulate, or control. Christian community characterized by love, acceptance, freedom, liberation, hope, vision, nurturing, and accountability; the kind that causes the world to know us as Christ’s by our love for one another.
- Institutional: working for institutions of beauty and working against destructive institutions. Prophetic witness is valuable here: we champion the state where it is bringing life and critique it where it is not. Wilberforce is an example in a participatory state, and Solzhenitsyn is an example in a totalitarian state.
- Strengths
- Calls us to “right relationships and right living” (176)
- Improves our understanding of the Church: we keep our culture (the positive elements) but yet Jew/Gentile, slave/free, male/female lines disappear.
- Bridges personal and social ethics, and thus helps avoid the problems that divorcing the two causes.
- Makes Christian love relevant; we cannot be just sentimental about it when we need to confront absentee landlords or prostitution rings.
- It is a basis for ecological concern, because we are stewards of the earth and it is groaning waiting for the sons of God to be revealed.
- Keeps the prophetic vision of the new heaven and new earth before us.
- Weaknesses
- A very great danger is that the work becomes and end in itself, and then all that is left “is a kind of social salvation that leaves people rooted in spiritual despair and alienated from God” (179)
- Legalism and judgementalism: judgement of your “comittment to the lifestyle” based on outward things, and no room for differences because the need is so great.
- Aligning with a political agenda. (If you are called to the political arena, you will might partner with people, but we need to have enough space to speak prophetically.)
Ch. 6: The Evangelical Tradition: Discovering the Word-Centered Life
- St. Augustine
- Although raised a Christian in Carthage, he indulged in a long-term mistress and studied and taught rhetoric, which he was good at. He moved to Rome and then Milan, gaining a teaching position, with the expectation of an eventual provincial governorship. However, he had a growing conviction that the life he was living was not right, but no power to change it. In Milan he came to the conclusion that he was teaching people how to lie with words. He had discussions with St. Ambrose (after originally observing him out of a professional interest in his rhetoric) who said Jesus had the power to “break the bonds of moral failure” (190), and upon hearing a voice from the neighboring garden one day saying “take up and read”, he opened the Bible and read Paul saying to put on Christ instead of the works of the flesh, and suddenly everything became clear. He was baptized, resigned his teaching commission, and traveled back to North Africa with a few companions.
- A few years later was forcibly ordained as a presbyter by popular acclamation while visiting Carthage, and a few years later became bishop. Shortly after becoming bishop he debated and soundly defeated the founder of the Manichaeans (whom he had spent quite a few years with while in Carthage, before realizing it was empty). He wrote against the Donatists and the Pelagians. His sermons were quite forceful, and were written down by shorthand writers (which was common at speaking events). There were no pews, so people were all together, and would respond to the message, so that it was more an event than a lecture. These sermons are all very evangelistic.
- His encounter with Cicero at a young age led to a desire to pursue wisdom/truth. The Manichaeans believed in dualism: good and evil are opposites with no other options (for instance, in the Force of Star Wars). The Neoplatonists viewed evil as the absence of good, which was a large influence on Augustine.
- He founded a lay community, Servi Dei. This did not embrace poverty but rather lived a simple life that was neither austere nor luxurious. Possidius was a contemporary who wrote a biography of Augustine and appears to have included some descriptions of the community.
- The Apostle Peter
- Peter was always saying things, but as a disciple it seems he frequently spoke whatever came to mind from the surface (e.g. at the transfiguration, or before Jesus washed his feet). His denial of Jesus three times seems to have really gotten his attention; although he did try, “the spiritual substance of his life ha[d] not yet matured” (202). When Jesus unexpectedly shows up with a breakfast of fish he gives Peter a lesson. The first two times he asks Peter, “‘Simon, ... do you agapas me?’ — ‘Do you love me with that [externally given] grace-filled, God-kissed love?’” (205) Although he would have once confidently said “yes!” now he says “you know I philo you”, “I love you as a loyal friend”. The third time he asks “do you phileis me?”, basically asking “do you actually love me as a friend?”, and Peter is grieved, but now his “yes” is humble and not an overconfident assertion.
- This apparently gave Peter the spiritual substance he needed, because ever afterwards he confidently and effectively preaches the good news. At Pentecost he stands up and gives an impromptu sermon, with 3000 coming to faith. He gives an equally powerful message to the Sandhedrin (although with rather fewer conversions). He continued calling people to discipleship the rest of his life, eventually being crucified upside down at his request.
- Billy Graham
- He felt the calling to preach while studying at university in Florida, and paddled out to an island to preach to the crocodiles and trees. He kept a tight focus on limiting his efforts to evangelism, especially after a short period of having been talked into running a university. However, he used every available medium to broadcast the message. He had large crusades, radio programs, and even started two magazines: Christianity Today (for Christian professionals) and Decision (for regular people). Beginning with the 1949 Crusade in Los Angeles, his Crusades brought hundreds of thousands of people, even a million at an island in Korea. He also started conferences for itinerant evangelists in the poor areas of the world—his organization had to actually figure out how many there were because no even had any idea (and it’s not like they attend international conferences).
- Contributions
- “[H]e has brought moral and fiscal integrity to itinerant evangelism” (212), which was sorely needed in his day. So he had strict accounting rules. He also used a salary system instead of relying on love offerings. These two things create an ethically strong financial system. To prevent sexual failures he had a rule to avoid any appearance of evil, and to not do anything with a member of the opposite sex alone (unless it was his wife).
- He partnered with a very broad range of Christians (like Moody, Finney, Wesley, etc.). Ultimately this angered the fundamentalists who had worked with him, and when he worked with the Protestant Council in NYC in 1957 (after turning down two previous invitations to NYC because the support was too narrow), the fundamentalists publicly denounced him. Although it was painful, he committed to preaching the Gospel and not getting into petty fights over non-essentials.
- He was a strong proponent of racial integration, after a short period of realizing that the Bible did not support the southern segregation he had grown up with. He refused to hold a Crusade in a place if he was not able to have integrated seating.
- What is the Evangelical Tradition?
- “The faithful proclaimation of the gospel ...”: we can be forgiven and made new in Christ through repentance and his death on the cross. This abundant life is not about getting into heaven (although that is a byproduct of having abundant life), it begins now. It requires being a disciple of Christ; this is not optional. Likewise, this requires that we are disciplines and experiencing this life.
- “... the centrality of Scripture as a faithful respository of the gospel ...”
- " ... the confessional witness of the early Christian community as a faithful interpretation of the gospel.” (219): The community created clarifications on the apostolic writers due to the many sects that sprang up; these are the creeds developed by the ecumenical councils.
- Strengths
- The emphasis on a call/invitation to “experience converting grace” (225).
- The emphasis on bringing this call to the entire world.
- Our culture makes accepting everyone’s belief an absolute, but not everything should be tolerated. If it is destructive it should not be tolerated. We are offering abundant life abundant.
- The emphasis on the external standard of the Bible. “The authority of the written Word gives us the criterion by which we test for error. This is utterly essential, for it we cannot test for error, we cannot claim truth.” (227) “The Christ event is the heart of Scripture.” (227)
- “[T]he evangelical witness to sound doctrine.” (227) Doctrine is not everything, but it is important. “‘True truth’” (Francis Schaeffer) is important.
- Weaknesses
- Being inflexible on non-essentials, which results when we cannot distinguish be essentials and non-essentials. “[T]he closer an the issue comes to the heart of the Christ event—Jesus’ birth, life, death, and resurrection—the more it becomes a matter of primary importance.” (228) While speaking in tongues and women in ministry are important issues, they are not of primary importance, and cannot be made into church dogma. Augustine: “in essentials unity, in doubtful questions liberty, in all things charity.” (229)
- We-are-the-true-church mentality. “When this occurs, the center of gravity shifts from a warm-heart experience of saving grace to an intolerant, censorious spirit.” (229)
- Related to this is a tendency to ignore everything between the end of Acts and Luther’s 95 theses on the grounds that they are corrupt, and not acknowledging that a lot of their own theology has roots in Augustine and others.
- Truncating the Gospel. One form is making the Gospel only about getting into Heaven; the other form is making it only about individual commitment to Christ and ignoring that discipleship and healing also concerns society and institutions.
- Worshiping the Bible. Generally people don’t do this directly, of course, but the ultimate goal is to know the living God, and the Bible is the means to that end, not the end in itself. "Christus Rex et Dominus Scripturae. ‘Christ is King and Lord of Scripture.’” (231)
- Doing it
- We need to saturate ourselves in the Bible so that God’s value system becomes our value system. This cannot be done on just 10 minutes a day; we need to read large sections at once.
- “Now if we really pay attention to those around us—learning their interests, needs, hopes, hurts, dreams, fears—we will be given what we need to say. Our lives will preach Christ, and our words will confirm and make specific the message of our lives.” (232)
- We aren’t in the business of “winning souls”: it’s the Holy Spirit’s job to convict people of sin, “we are simply and solely witness to how good God is and to what transforming things he has done in us.” (233)
Ch.7: The Incarnation Tradition: Discovering the Sacramental Life
- Susanna Wesley (Charles and John Wesley’s mother):
- Had 19 children, 10 of whom survived. Considered being a mother a vocation, and likewise treated daily activities as part of living out her faith. She home-schooled all ten children with a custom curriculum, in addition to cooking, etc., keeping the household accounts, and meeting privately with each child once a week. The private sessions were very impactful; John noted their importance to him. She was very patient, repeating something until the child got it (her husband counted 20 times once). She also instilled a love of learning: the boys went on to college, and the girls (who could not at that time) were equally accomplished, and one was even in Samuel Johnson’s circle.
- She used hard times as opportunities become more like Christ. She had many: her daughter Hetty got pregnant from a one night stand and was disowned by her father; Susanna did not say “amen” to the prayer for the king once and her husband refused to forgive her for six months, until a fire that destroyed 2/3 of their home; another fire burned everything and John was narrowly saved from death.
- Because her husband (a Church of England cleric) was sometimes gone for extended periods and his assistant was not very able, she held Sunday evening meetings in the kitchen. Soon they had larger attendance than the main service. Her husband told her to stop, and she defended herself, and then said that if he insisted that she stop, he needed to tell her in such a way that she would be absolved of guilt on Judgement Day from neglecting the education of souls. The meetings continued. She also corresponded with her children at university continuing their theological education, and was correspondence advisor for the “Holy Club” at Oxford. John referred to her as a “preacher of righteousness”.
- Later, one time when John and Charles were out evangelizing elsewhere, a Thomas Maxwell was in charge of the local service and even though he was not ordained and therefore could not preach, he got carried away one time and did preach. John hastily came back to address the situation, but Susanna told him to look at the fruit of his preaching before doing anything because she was convinced he was as called by God to preach as the ordained John was. John did so, and was equally convinced, and this conviction ultimately led to the many itinerant evangelists that spread the Methodist movement.
- Mary and Jesus best represent the incarnational model, “Here I am, the servant of the Lord; let it be with me according to your word”.
- Bezalel
- God specifically told Moses to put him in charge of the artistry and craftsmanship for the Tabernacle. He was the first person the Bible said was filled with God’s Spirit. He acted as “general contractor”, and he had Oholiab who was the “foreman”. (There were also “owners”, the people, who paid gladly for the work.) Bezalel taught other people the skilled work needed to create the Tabernacle (Ex 35:34). Bezalel was not only a skilled craftsman, but he was also imaginative (able to catch the vision from Moses’ description), articulate (could communicate to the other craftsmen), and an able administrator (he had to find, manage, and delegate all the other craftsmen).
- Dag Hammarskjöld
- His family had been civil servants for over 300 years. He was inculcated in the value of serving others through government service (“duty”) from his father, and from his mother received a value for the equality of all men under God as well as a model of courage and goodness. He served in many posts, ultimately serving as the U.N. Secretary-General who “transformed the United Nations from a forum for conference and controversy into an agency of creative action for peace.” (259) It was during this time that he wrote “‘In our era, the road to holiness necessarily passes through the world of action.’” (253)
- He died in an airplane crash on the way to peace negotiations in Congo. He left his private journal to a friend, with permission to publish it if he thought it helpful for people. This was done, and is published under the title Markings. It is Hammarskjöld’s “‘negotiations with myself—and with God’” (252) and contains no reference to his career. The first 25 years are just 1/6 of the book. At 45 (in 1950), he was seen as the model of a successful man but his journal reads of someone near despair. The next three years are his dark night of the soul where it seems that he is searching for meaning. “‘But at some moment I did answer Yes to Someone—or Something—and from that hour I was certain that existence is meaningful and that, therefore, my life, in self-surrender, had a goal. From that moment I have known what it means “not to look back,” and “To take no thought for the morrow.” Led by the Ariadne’s thread of my answer through the labyrinth of Life, I came to a time and place where I realized that the Way leads to a triumph which is a catastrophe, and to a catastrophe which is a triumph, that the the price for committing one’s life would be reproach, and that the only elevation possible to man lies in the depths of humiliation. After that, the word “courage” lost its meaning, since nothing could be taken from me.’” (258) His Yes continued confidently throughout the rest of the journal.
- After the Suez Canal crisis was resolved, he wrote that it is not one’s own efforts that bring the results but rather God, but that one can rejoice when God has a use for one’s efforts. This is a summary of the sacramental life.
- What is the Incarnational Stream?
- “... God is manifest to us through material means.” (260) Matter is good, not evil, and matter is how we experience God and is how we develop our spirit. The physical world is, indeed, “the ‘icon’ of God, the epiphany of his glory [... and ...] is intended to enhance human life.” (260)
- The religious dimension: corporate worship in liturgy
- We all use material things to “express and manifest the spiritual” (261). This is liturgy (“the people’s work”). All of us have liturgy of necessity, but we do not all have the same liturgy. It might be the monastic Offices, or the Quaker silent waiting, or hymns, but we all have liturgy. The form is not the important part, but what the form contains: the worship of God. One kind of treasure, but held in earthen jars of many different forms. The forms of worship are sometimes called “sacramentals”: “‘more than symbols and less than sacraments’” (262)
- Sacraments: “‘visible means of an invisible grace’” (262)
- Every day life
- We actually live out being Christ with our families, our work/vocation, and in society at large.
- C.S. Lewis: the unpleasant things aren’t interruptions to our lives, but actually our lives. Our “real life” is a fantasy.
- Incarnational living at work is not retreating from the busyness to read our Bible during lunch (which might still be good). Incarnational living is what happens during the busyness and chaos of the day.
- We learn to work (and to live, and to love, etc.) how Jesus would do it if he were us.
- Martin Luther links the two spheres, for instance saying that every day life is where we constantly do what baptism symbolizes: die and rise again. Similarly, the “priesthood of believers” is not so much that all people can be priests, but rather that the mundane things we is priestly work. [Presumably if done in the right fashion, not that the mundanity is priestly, but that all of life can be priestly work]
- Strengths
- Emphasizes that God is among us in all our daily activities.
- Prevents spirituality from being separated from the difficult of everyday life.
- Endues our work with meaning.
- Antidote to Gnostic thinking (matter is evil and spirit is good).
- Constantly leads us to God
- Our body is a “portable sanctuary” (267) of the presence of God, which we experience in deeper learning and cooperation with him.
- Values stewardship of the earth.
- Weaknesses
- Idolatry: it is tempting to worship the material world because it is so incredible (e.g. pantheism). Also happens when we “fail to distinguish between a sacred object and the spiritual reality it signifies.” (267)
- Trying to “manage God through externals”. Two biblical examples are Cain’s offering and Ananias and Sapphira’s offering. “Perhaps this peril reaches its highest expression in religious structures that seek to confine and control the work of God through ritual systems.” (268) This typically manifests itself as groups and churches saying that in order to find God you can only do it through our group/system/rituals. Jesus addresses this when he effectively says “‘This temple and all its rites can dry up and blow away and your blessedness under God will remain.’” (269)
- Practicing incarnational living
- Invite God’s manifest presence into all the areas of our life.
- Considering work as a calling/vocation. (“Calling” is not limited to pastoral ministry!)
- Marriage and family. “Family life should be expressed in its fullness in the home, because this is the place where the specifically religious dimension and everyday life meet. The home is intrinsically a religious institution, and the family table is the center of the home. ... The idea that a meal can be a sacred occasion is so deeply rooted in many religious traditions that it cannot be accidental or of passing significance.” (271) Also the home is the place of common labor, of play, of love-making, etc.
Copyright © 2024 by Geoffrey Prewett